AI Governance

Govern Your AI
Before Regulators Do.

The EU AI Act is in force. GDPR Article 22 obligations are enforceable today. And organizations deploying AI without governance frameworks are creating legal, reputational, and operational exposure they may not discover until it's too late. We build AI governance programs that are technically implemented, not just documented.

What We Do

AI Governance That Goes Beyond the Policy Doc

Every organization using AI needs a governance framework. Most stop at documentation. We build the operational and technical infrastructure that makes the framework real — traceable, auditable, and defensible when it matters.

01
Foundation

AI Inventory & Risk Classification

You cannot govern AI systems you haven't catalogued. We conduct a structured inventory of every AI system in use across your organization — including embedded vendor tools and third-party APIs — and classify each against the EU AI Act's four-tier risk framework and your applicable regulatory requirements. The output is a living registry your legal and technical teams can use.

AI System Registry EU AI Act Classification Third-Party AI Review Risk Tier Mapping Use-Case Documentation
02
Assessment

AI Impact Assessment & DPIA Integration

High-risk AI systems under the EU AI Act require conformity assessments. AI systems processing personal data trigger GDPR Data Protection Impact Assessments. We conduct both, integrating them into a unified assessment process that satisfies multiple regulatory obligations without duplicating effort — and produces the documentation regulators actually look for.

EU AI Act Conformity DPIA for AI Systems Bias & Fairness Assessment Fundamental Rights Impact Technical Documentation
03
Compliance

EU AI Act Implementation

The EU AI Act is the most comprehensive AI regulation in effect globally — and its extraterritorial reach means any organization offering AI-powered products or services to EU markets must comply. We map your obligations by system risk tier, build the required technical documentation, implement human oversight mechanisms, and establish the post-market monitoring your high-risk systems require.

High-Risk System Docs Human Oversight Design Logging & Record-Keeping Transparency Obligations Post-Market Monitoring
04
Accountability

Model Auditing & Explainability

GDPR Article 22 gives individuals the right to meaningful information about automated decisions. The EU AI Act requires traceability and explainability for high-risk systems. We audit models for bias, document decision logic, implement explainability layers where required, and establish the logging infrastructure that makes automated decisions traceable to specific inputs, outputs, and model versions.

Model Audit & Documentation Explainability Framework Bias Testing GDPR Art. 22 Compliance Decision Logging
05
Policy

AI Policy & Governance Framework

Governance frameworks fail when they live only in policy documents. We design AI governance programs that connect policy to practice — acceptable use policies, procurement guidelines for AI vendors, internal review processes for new AI deployments, escalation procedures, and board-level reporting frameworks that give leadership meaningful oversight of AI risk across the organization.

Acceptable Use Policy AI Procurement Guidelines Review & Approval Processes Board Reporting Templates Staff Training
06
Advisory

Fractional CAIO & Ongoing Advisory

AI governance isn't a one-time project — it's an ongoing function. As AI systems evolve and the regulatory landscape shifts, organizations need someone with the authority and expertise to keep pace. Our fractional Chief AI Officer engagements provide the senior leadership necessary to own AI governance, respond to regulatory inquiries, and ensure your organization stays ahead of the curve.

Fractional CAIO Regulatory Monitoring Governance Program Mgmt Regulatory Inquiry Response Quarterly Reviews
EU AI Act

The Most Consequential AI Law In Force Today

The EU AI Act entered into force in August 2024. Prohibitions on unacceptable-risk systems became enforceable in February 2025. Obligations for high-risk systems — including technical documentation, human oversight, and post-market monitoring — apply from August 2026. Penalties for non-compliance reach €35 million or 7% of global annual turnover.

The Act applies not just to EU-based organizations, but to any company placing AI systems on the EU market or deploying them to affect people in the EU. If you use AI in healthcare, hiring, credit, law enforcement, education, or critical infrastructure — you almost certainly have high-risk obligations.

We help organizations understand where they stand, what they owe, and how to build a compliance program that holds up under scrutiny.

EU AI Act — Four Risk Tiers
Prohibited
Unacceptable Risk — Banned
Social scoring, subliminal manipulation, real-time remote biometric surveillance in public spaces, emotion recognition in workplaces and schools.
High Risk
Conformity Assessment Required
AI in healthcare, hiring, credit scoring, law enforcement, education, and critical infrastructure. Requires technical docs, DPIA, human oversight, and logging.
Limited Risk
Transparency Obligations
Chatbots, deepfakes, AI-generated content. Must disclose AI nature to users. Lower compliance burden but non-trivial obligations.
Minimal Risk
Voluntary Codes of Conduct
Spam filters, basic recommendations, AI-assisted tools with no material impact on individuals. Encouraged but not required to follow voluntary guidelines.
01 Inventory

AI System Discovery & Registry

We begin with a structured discovery process across your organization — interviewing technical, operational, and procurement teams to surface every AI system in use, including embedded vendor tools, third-party APIs, and systems your teams may not formally classify as "AI." Each system is documented and entered into a governance registry.

Cross-functional stakeholder interviews
Vendor and third-party AI system cataloguing
EU AI Act risk tier classification for each system
Living AI registry delivered and maintained
02 Assessment

Risk Assessment & Impact Analysis

With a complete inventory in hand, we conduct formal risk assessments for each system — evaluating compliance obligations under the EU AI Act, GDPR Article 22, and any sector-specific requirements. High-risk and limited-risk systems receive full impact assessments, bias testing, and gap analyses against applicable technical standards.

EU AI Act conformity gap analysis per system
Integrated DPIA for personal-data-processing AI
Bias, fairness, and fundamental rights assessment
Prioritized remediation roadmap with deadlines
03 Implementation

Controls & Policy Deployment

Governance lives in systems and processes, not just documents. We implement the technical controls and operational procedures required by your AI obligations — human oversight mechanisms, logging and audit trails, transparency notices, model documentation, and the internal review workflows that keep new AI deployments from bypassing governance.

Human oversight mechanism design and deployment
Logging, audit trail, and version control for AI systems
Transparency notices and disclosure frameworks
AI procurement and deployment review processes
04 Ongoing

Monitoring & Program Management

AI governance is a continuous function, not a project. Regulations evolve, AI systems change, and new use cases emerge. We provide ongoing advisory and program management to keep your governance framework current — monitoring regulatory developments, reviewing new AI deployments before launch, and providing the board-level reporting that demonstrates governance is real.

Regulatory change monitoring and impact analysis
Pre-deployment review for new AI use cases
Quarterly governance program reviews
Board-level AI risk reporting templates
Framework Coverage

Every Major AI Governance Standard

AI governance sits at the intersection of privacy law, technology regulation, and organizational risk management. We work across every major framework — so your program satisfies multiple obligations without building separate silos for each.

EU AI Act European Union Artificial Intelligence Act — Full Compliance Lifecycle
GDPR Art. 22 Automated Decision-Making — Rights, Safeguards & Meaningful Explanations
NIST AI RMF NIST Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework 1.0
ISO 42001 ISO/IEC 42001 — AI Management System Standard
OECD AI OECD Principles on Artificial Intelligence — Accountability & Transparency
HIPAA AI HHS Guidance on AI in Clinical Decision Support & Healthcare Systems
CCPA / AI California CPRA — Automated Decision-Making Technology Regulations
EO 14110 US Executive Order on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy AI — Federal Guidance
Get Started

Build a Governance Program That Holds Up.

Whether you need an AI inventory, a full EU AI Act compliance program, or ongoing fractional CAIO support, we'll scope an engagement tailored to your regulatory obligations and organizational maturity.